By H. Jaffar. LeMoyne-Owen College. 2018.
Inclusion of sample or group sizes helps readers to interpret the data correctly and calculate other statistics that may be of interest to them discount 25 mg pamelor with mastercard. It is not a good idea to include sample or group sizes at the base of a table buy pamelor 25mg otc. The meanings of “year 8” as the second year of secondary school and “year 9” as 12 months later are defined in the Methods section of the paper discount 25mg pamelor overnight delivery. It is better not to present the same data in both a figure and a table buy pamelor 25 mg cheap, and never to repeat data from figures or tables in the text. Readers do not want to be given the same information in multiple formats. Indeed, readers may get confused if a percentage of 54·7% in the table is repeated as 55% in the text. It is best to just give the results once, check that they are correct and use a format that gets your message across clearly in one go. Each table needs a title that tells the reader how to interpret the data. It is much better to have an inclusive title and detailed row and column descriptors than to put the essential information into footnotes, which should be avoided as far as possible. Readers will not want to search the text, the title, and the row and the column headings of the table before finally going to footnotes to find the information that they need before they can interpret your findings. Finally, tables should be submitted on separate pages and not incorporated into the text. It is common practice to print tables one to a page and include them at the end of the manuscript. Figures and graphics Art does not reproduce what we see; rather, it makes us see. Paul Klee (1879–1940) 78 Writing your paper Figures and graphs are essential for conveying results in a clear way. A cryptic approach is to show your most important findings as a figure, but only as long as the figure does not take up much more space than reporting the data would. The figure in which you present your main results should be totally self-explanatory and have a bold, stand-alone quality. A good figure tells the story in a single grab and stays in a reader’s mind. Such figures are often taken up by other researchers in their talks to wider audiences and thus help to promote your work. Figures that you use in talks to colleagues are often too simplified for a journal article in which all of the details must be included in the absence of any accompanying oral explanations. However, figures with too much detail become complicated and difficult to understand when the message gets lost in the graphics and the explanations. The symbols, abbreviations, hatching, line types, and bars must all be very clear and must be explained in detail without cluttering the picture. Also, the figure legend should be comprehensive so that the figure can be fully understood without recourse to reading explanatory text in the results section. Pie charts, which are often useful in oral presentations, have few applications in published journal articles. They are space greedy, the information cannot usually be used to provide an accurate comparison of results between groups, and the numbers are usually better accommodated in a table or bar graph, which takes less space. When creating a figure, always shrink the printed copy down to the size that it will be in the final copy of the journal and then examine it for legibility. Your work may have to survive a massive reduction during the publication process. Labels that are very readable on an A4 sheet often lose clarity when shrunk into a much smaller format. The most readable figures have large legends and axes descriptors, and use hatching and markings that discriminate clearly between groups. The line 79 Scientific Writing 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Intervention 20 Usual care P = 0.
Therefore 25mg pamelor overnight delivery, we believe that daily wash with application of silver sulfadiazine is the treatment of choice purchase pamelor 25 mg amex. Patients are best managed with daily wash of the area and application of silver sulfadiazine until complete re-epithelialization has occurred quality 25 mg pamelor. Pain is very low purchase pamelor 25mg online, and patients feel very comfortable with this dressing. Another type of burns that can benefit of silver sulfadiazine application are some hand burns not suitable for Biobrane or Mepitel application (geographical burns with large nonburned areas, hand–palm burns, finger burns). The application of hand bags with silver sulfadiazine is painless and allows easy and early mobilization of the involved anatomical areas. Treatment ofLarge Superficial Partial-Thickness Burns ( 30% TBSA) Homograft These are uncommon injuries that can lead to a high morbidity and mortality rate. They are more prone to contamination and infection than medium-sized superficial burns, large amounts of fluid resuscitation are necessary, and intense swelling often occurs. Cardiogenic and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema are complications that carry a high risk of mortality in patients with these injuries. Superficial Burns 183 Best results are achieved if homograft is applied within 24 h of the injury. Under general anesthesia the wound is cleaned and all blisters and nonadherent epidermis removed. It is not uncommon to observe mixed areas of superficial and indeterminate depth in these large injuries. Areas of indeterminate depth are shaved superficially with the Zimmer or Padget powered dermatome with depth settings of 8–10/1000 inch. Cryopreserved or fresh homograft split-skin grafts are placed over the open dermal wound and secured with staples. If homografts are meshed, it is important not to open the mesh on the homograft: this can lead to desiccation, infection, and deepening of the underlying wound. Wounds are inspected at 48–72 h unless the condition of the patient dictates otherwise. When homografts are stable, the wound can be left open with petroleum jelly gauze covering to prevent desiccation or a light dressing applied (Fig. As the healing process progresses, homografts separate after leaving a completely re-epithelialized wound. When homografts are stable, patients can be gently showered or bathed; all areas that start to separate can be trimmed. Big dressing changes are not necessary, and pain control is easily achieved. Alternative temporary skin substitutes Biobrane can be used in the same way as for smaller injuries. There is a higher rate of wound infection, which can lead to loss of the Biobrane and deepening of the burn wound. Given the large surface area covered with Biobrane, if purulent collections develop under the synthetic membrane, patients can experience severe sepsis and septic shock. Therefore, we do not advise treatment of large areas with Biobrane unless human cadaver skin is not available. If Biobrane is chosen, daily inspection is absolutely necessary, with aggressive intervention and trim- ming of all nonadherent areas should the patients become unwell and septic. TransCyte can be used in a similar manner to Biobrane, and, as with medium size superficial burns, it is particularly helpful in neonates and small infants. Such skin does not adhere as well, and desiccation can lead to infection and deepening of the burn wound, requiring formal excision and autografting. It is our belief that homografts provide the best treatment for these injuries, because the grafts are viable and protect the healing wound by creating a permanent moist environment with the benefit of growth factors produced by dermal fibroblasts. Topical Antimicrobial Creams The traditional method of treatment for massive superficial partial-thickness burns has been for many decades the application of topical antimicrobials daily. Among them, 1% silver sulfadiazine has been the gold standard for many years. Patients require daily dressing changes, which are such a painful ordeal for patients that 184 Barret and Dziewulski A B FIGURE 12 Treatment of massive superficial partial-thickness burns with superfi- cial debridement and homograft application leads to a perfect outcome. Homograft skin does not vascularize, allowing re-epithelialization underneath.
It is important to note that such findings are not likely to generalize to all types of clinical acute pain order 25 mg pamelor amex. Clearly pamelor 25 mg line, procedures associated with more in- tense acute pain discount pamelor 25 mg, such as even “minor” surgery discount 25 mg pamelor overnight delivery, require pharmacological analgesia. However, the results reported earlier indicate that combining psychological and pharmacological approaches may have significant bene- 260 BRUEHL AND CHUNG fits to patients. MODERATORS OF RESPONSES TO PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS Spontaneous Coping Strategies Many individuals implement their own spontaneous pain coping strategies when faced with acute pain (Spanos et al. The possibility that externally imposed interventions may interfere with pa- tients’ implementation of effective pain control strategies already in their behavioral repertoire cannot be ruled out. Although some studies suggest that these spontaneous coping strategies may be effective for pain reduc- tion (Spanos et al. Coping Style Patients’ preferred style of coping with stress, whether Monitoring or Blunting in character, may be relevant to understanding the efficacy of spe- cific psychological acute pain interventions. Monitors, also referred to as Sensitizers or Vigilants, prefer to cope with stressful situations by seeking out information about the stimulus, and by monitoring and trying to miti- gate their responses to the stimulus (Schultheis, Peterson, & Selby, 1987). Blunters, also termed Repressors, Avoiders, Distractors, or Deniers, prefer to cope with stressful situations through avoidance and by denial of the stressor (Schultheis et al. A number of studies have hypothesized that psychological acute pain in- terventions work best if they match an individual’s naturally preferred cop- ing style. For example, providing a sensory focus intervention to a Blunter would be considered a mismatched intervention, whereas a relaxing imag- ery strategy would be considered a matched intervention for such an indi- vidual (Fanurick et al. Laboratory acute pain studies have provided some evidence indicating that interventions matched to preferred coping style result in more effective reductions in acute pain responsiveness (e. PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR ACUTE PAIN 261 Clinical studies regarding this issue are mixed, but generally negative. Although there were no interaction ef- fects regarding pain experienced during the procedures, Monitors were found to experience less distress in the information provision condition whereas Blunters experienced greater distress (Shipley et al. Studies performed in the context of more severe acute clinical pain, on the other hand, are more negative. In a study of general surgery patients, efficacy of information pro- vision, relaxation, and no intervention was compared as a function of Moni- toring and Blunting coping styles (Scott & Clum, 1984). Blunters reported less pain and used less analgesics when provided with no intervention, which appear at least not inconsistent with the matching hypothesis. How- ever, contrary to the matching hypothesis, Monitors appeared to do best with breathing relaxation as opposed to information provision (Scott & Clum, 1984). Work by Wilson (1981) also in general surgery patients found that Blunters did not experience exacerbated pain following an information provision intervention, again failing to support the matching hypothesis. More recent work in surgical patients also indicated that efficacy of a relax- ation intervention did not differ depending on the degree to which patients preferred a Monitoring coping style (Miro & Raich, 1999). Differences in the measures used to assess coping style, types of interventions employed, and other procedural details make comparisons across studies more difficult. However, clinical support for a coping style by intervention type matching hypothesis is at best weak. Moreover, the absence of validated clinical pro- cedures for determining preferred coping style for purposes of selection of intervention type (e. Other Potential Moderators As noted previously, there is evidence from several studies that interven- tions including sensory focus, breathing relaxation, and use of control- enhancing statements reduce the discomfort of dental procedures only among those with a high desire for control and a low level of perceived con- trol prior to intervention (Baron et al. Given the importance of perceived control in determining satisfaction with acute pain management (Pellino & Ward, 1998), these findings suggest that if resources for providing psychological acute pain interventions are lim- ited, it may be most appropriate to focus these resources on individuals who express a desire for greater control over the acute pain experience. Laboratory acute pain research has indicated that imagery, analgesia suggestions, and distraction were effec- tive for reducing acute pain only among individuals high in hypnotizability (Farthing et al. This might not be considered surprising given that individuals high in hypnotizability may be more capable of developing vivid mental imagery (Farthing et al. As with coping style, validated clini- cal criteria for making treatment decisions based on assessment of hypno- tizability are not available. Therefore, the practical clinical utility of this moderator variable is questionable. BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE CLINICAL USE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR ACUTE PAIN If psychological interventions for acute pain can be clinically useful in some circumstances, as appears to be the case, what are the barriers to their use? A study by Jiang and colleagues (Jiang, Lagasse, Ciccone, Jakubowski, & Kitain, 2001) of hospital acute pain management practices indicated wide- spread underutilization of nonpharmacological techniques.
A patient with contains the blood vessels and nerves that supply the such a tooth fracture involving injury to the pulp tooth from the jaw pamelor 25mg otc. A patient with dentin bone to the root and anchors the tooth in the socket pamelor 25 mg online. A patient with enamel only involvement does not need immediate referral FIELD SIDE ASSESSMENT and can return to normal play with a protective mouth guard but must see a dentist for follow-up within 24 h effective 25mg pamelor. Any tooth frag- checking for lacerations of the head or injury to the ments that can be saved should be given to the patient neck injury purchase pamelor 25mg on-line. The tempormandibular joint (TMJ) can be to bring to the dental examination. If the intrusion is (>6 mm) check for deviation which could indicate a unilateral then the prognosis is extremely poor. Palpation of the zygomatic arch, outcome of an intrusive injury depends on the sever- angle, and lower border of the mandible should be ity of the injury, concurrent crown fracture, and treat- checked for tenderness, swelling, and bruising to rule ment methods. This type of injury needs Intraoral examination of the lips, tongue, cheek, an immediate referral to a dentist. The tooth should palate, and floor of the mouth to check for laceration. The anterior Atooth that has had an extrusion injury will interfere border of the ramus can be palpated intraorally. The displaced tooth palpated and if need be radiographed to rule out will be in front of or behind the normal tooth row. These teeth will be quite painful to return to normal position, therefore these patients need immediate dental evaluation, treatment, and follow-up. An extruded tooth SPECIFIC INJURIES may be gently attempted to be repositioned in the field if not too painful (Roberts, 2000; Trope, 2002). TRAUMA An avulsed tooth is a tooth that has completely come out of the socket. The tooth has been separated from Maxillomandibular relationships can increase risk for the socket and often there are vital PDL cells on the orofacial injury. The prognosis is much higher for suc- orthodontic status increases the rate of incisal trauma. The tooth must first be located; it may be in the upper teeth protrudes past the lower teeth, also the patient’s mouth, on their clothing, or near the called an overbite or buck teeth), having an overjet injury site. The avulsed tooth should be handled very greater than 4 mm, having a short upper lip, incompe- carefully-only by the crown/enamel therefore not tent lips or a mouth breather will increase chance of causing further damage to the root surface. A referral to an orthodontist to evaluate should be implanted within the first 20 min of injury to for orthodontic correction to reduce such risks is very increase success of reimplantation. The tooth should be gently cleansed complication of the tooth fracture would involve with saline and repositioned in the socket, if the patient 172 SECTION 3 MEDICAL PROBLEMS IN THE ATHLETE is alert. The tooth will click into place, but make sure performed whether cellulitis is indurated or fluctuant the tooth is properly positioned. The athlete should These patients will need surgical drainage and IV broad then follow up with a dentist immediately for defini- spectrum antibiotics immediately. The PDL and alveolar bone are destroyed by most suitable transport medium is Hank’s balanced bacterial plaque. Athletes with evidence of periodontal salt solution (HBSS) because of its pH-preserving disease should be referred to the care of a periodontist. Save-a-Tooth Dental decay or caries is caused by oral bacterial dem- (Biologic Rescue Products, Conshohacken, PA) is one ineralizing tooth enamel and dentin. HBSS should be readily avail- tion from the fermentation of dietary carbohydrates able at schools, emergency rooms, athletic coach by oral bacteria demineralizes the tooth. Cool milk has been shown to work as a better medium than PREVENTION warm milk. Also, getting the tooth into a medium within the first 15 min increases cell survival and Aproperly fitted mouth guard should be protective, com- reimplantation success (Trope, 2002). Mouth guards are worn in greater than 30 min decreases chance of survival. On the contrary in basketball where mouth 90% chance the tooth will be retained for life guards are not routinely worn oral facial injuries are 34% (Douglas and Douglas, 2003). The American Dental Association (ADA) Primary avulsed teeth should not be reimplanted estimates mouth guards have prevented 200,000 injuries because this could injure the permanent tooth follicle per year.
Similarly cheap pamelor 25mg mastercard, social modeling and social learning experiences influence strongly the way in which one interprets and responds to signs and symptoms of illness (e purchase pamelor 25 mg without a prescription. So buy pamelor 25mg visa, interpre- tation and behavioral responses to pain depend effective pamelor 25mg, to some degree, on what is learned from seeing others in pain and from cultural norms. This is recog- nized, to varying degrees, in all of the biopsychosocial models discussed ear- lier and provides the umbrella under which our model is placed. As illustrated, our integrated diathesis–stress model recognizes the im- portance of physiological, psychological, and sociocultural factors in the etiology, exacerbation, and maintenance of chronic pain. Interactions be- tween various factors are clearly indicated and, importantly, can lead to a vicious, self-reinforcing cycle that influences and is influenced by distress and functional disability. An initial physical pathology or injury is recog- nized as necessary to nociception and the appraisal that set the cycle in motion. The difference between those who become distressed and disabled (like Kelly) and those who don’t (like Jamie) is presumed to lie in the manner in which nociception is appraised and responded to. Those with a predisposi- tion that reduces threshold for nociceptive activation and increases the tendency to respond with fear to bodily sensations (i. In turn, they develop cognitive and behavioral repertoires that serve to maintain this preparedness. Also, phys- iological stimulation shifts from nociceptive input of the precipitating pa- thology or injury to that stemming from autonomic nervous system and muscular activation. Learning processes contribute not only to the mainte- nance of the vicious cycle, but to anxious anticipation regarding events only remotely associated with pain-specific distress and disability. BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL APPROACHES TO PAIN 53 general sense of perceived readiness for and inability to influence person- ally relevant events and outcomes develops. Those without the necessary predisposition appraise their pain sensation as nonthreatening, do not re- spond with maladaptive cognitive or behavioral repertoires, and in most cases recover. CONCLUSIONS The primary intent of this chapter was to provide an overview of the vari- ous expressions of pain that have been prominent over the years in ad- dressing the enduring questions of “What is pain? Subsequent to the seminal contributions of Melzack and colleagues (Melzack & Casey, 1968; Melzack & Wall, 1965), models moved toward a multidimensional conceptualization, recognizing a complex interplay between physiological, psychological, and sociocultural mechanisms in the pain experience. Today there are a num- ber of heuristic biopsychosocial models, each holding (sometimes overlap- ping) implications for understanding, assessing, and treating pain that per- sists in the absence of identifiable physical pathology. We have presented an integrated diathesis–stress model of chronic pain founded, in part, on empirical support garnered from tests of other models, in an attempt to emphasize the importance of interplay between biology, cognition, affect, and social factors, as well as the key role of learning and associated self-reinforcing feedback loops. In this context it should be clear that simplistic notions of somatogenesis and psychogenesis are obsolete. Our model, like its predecessors, yields a number of questions that, should they be answered systematically, will serve to guide further advances in both pain assessment and intervention strategies. To what extend does anxious apprehension for pain-specific events and experiences generalize to other sectors of a person’s life? Can we apply the models in a way that allows identification of vulnerable or at-risk people prior to devel- opment of chronic pain and associated disability? What is the best method of intervention for those who become mired in the vicious cycle? Graded in vivo exposure appears to have great potential, but is there more to learn from the effective interventions of fun- damental fears? How do we best address the influence of social influences in the context of intervention? Engel’s “Psychogenic pain and the pain-prone patient”: A retrospective, controlled clinical study. Self efficacy as a mediator of the relationship between pain intensity, disability and depression in chronic pain patients. Anxiety sensitivity and chronic pain: Empirical findings, clinical im- plications, and future directions.
9 of 10 - Review by H. Jaffar
Votes: 185 votes
Total customer reviews: 185