By A. Bradley. Nicholls State University.
Medication adherence and long-term functional outcomes in the treatment of schizophrenia in usual care purchase medrol 4mg overnight delivery. Al-Zakwani IS buy 16mg medrol with amex, Barron JJ generic medrol 4mg without a prescription, Bullano MF generic medrol 4mg line, Arcona S, Drury CJ, Cockerham TR. Analysis of healthcare utilization patterns and adherence in patients receiving typical and atypical antipsychotic medications. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: an open randomized clinical trial World Psychiatry. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in first- episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: an open randomised clinical trial. Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate in acute schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled study. Lauriello J, McEvoy JP, Rodriguez S, Bossie CA, Lasser RA. Intramuscular aripiprazole for the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with intramuscular haloperidol. Tran-Johnson TK, Sack DA, Marcus RN, Auby P, McQuade RD, Oren DA. Efficacy and safety of intramuscular aripiprazole in patients with acute agitation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-response comparison of intramuscular olanzapine and haloperidol in the treatment of acute agitation in schizophrenia. Atypical antipsychotic drugs Page 176 of 230 Final Report Update 3 Drug Effectiveness Review Project 300. Intramuscular olanzapine and intramuscular haloperidol in acute schizophrenia: antipsychotic efficacy and extrapyramidal safety during the first 24 hours of treatment. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry - Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie. Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of intramuscular olanzapine and intramuscular haloperidol in the treatment of acute agitation in schizophrenia. Intramuscular ziprasidone compared with intramuscular haloperidol in the treatment of acute psychosis. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of olanzapine versus haloperidol during transition from intramuscular to oral therapy. Extrapyramidal side-effects of antipsychotics in a randomised trial. Influence of atypical neuroleptics on executive functioning in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind comparison of olanzapine vs. Procedural learning in schizophrenia after 6 months of double-blind treatment with olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. Alvarez E, Baron F, Perez-Blanco J, Soriano DPJ, Masip C, Perez-Sola V. European Psychiatry: the Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists. Schillevoort I, de Boer A, Herings RM, Roos RA, Jansen PA, Leufkens HG. Risk of extrapyramidal syndromes with haloperidol, risperidone, or olanzapine. Heinrich K, Klieser E, Lehmann E, Kinzler E, Hruschka H. Risperidone versus clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenic patients with acute symptoms: a double blind, randomized trial. Experimental comparison of the efficacy and compatibility of clozapine and risperidone in acute schizophrenia. Miller CH, Mohr F, Umbricht D, Woerner M, Fleischhacker WW, Lieberman JA.
Primary indicators of oppositional defiant disorder include hostility generic 16 mg medrol with visa, negativism discount 4mg medrol overnight delivery, and defiance toward authority order 16 mg medrol amex. This pattern of behaviors has emerged prior to age 8 in approximately 2% to 16% of the adolescent population discount medrol 4 mg on-line. In some cases, features of oppositional defiant disorder can increase in severity and become more characteristic of conduct disorder. Individuals with conduct disorder may demonstrate a pattern of aggressiveness toward people and animals, vandalism and/or theft of property, and other serious rule violations. Conduct disorder emerges prior to the age of 16 and is more common in males. Prevalence estimates are variable and have been as high as 10%. Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder are both associated with significant impairment in home, school, and occupational settings and can lead to disciplinary, legal, and physical injury consequences. Individuals that present with patterns of behavior similar to yet do not meet DSM-IV criteria for oppositional defiant or conduct disorders can be diagnosed with disruptive behavior disorder, not otherwise specified. Psychotropic medication commonly targets reduction of aggression among individuals presenting with these conditions. Atypical antipsychotic drugs Page 17 of 230 Final Report Update 3 Drug Effectiveness Review Project Scales and Tests Used to Measure Outcomes There are many methods of measuring outcomes with antipsychotic drugs and severity of extrapyramidal side effects using a variety of assessment scales. Appendix A summarizes the most common scales and provides a comprehensive list of scale abbreviations. Terms commonly used in systematic reviews, such as statistical terms, are provided in Appendix B. Purpose and Limitations of Evidence Reports Systematic reviews, or evidence reports, are the building blocks underlying evidence-based practice. An evidence report focuses attention on the strength and limits of evidence from published studies about the effectiveness of a clinical intervention. The development of an evidence report begins with a careful formulation of the problem. The goal is to select questions that are important to patients and clinicians, then to examine how well the scientific literature answers those questions. An evidence report emphasizes the patient’s perspective in the choice of outcome measures. Studies that measure health outcomes (events or conditions that the patient can feel, such as quality of life, functional status, and fractures) are emphasized over studies of intermediate outcomes (such as changes in bone density). Such a report also emphasizes measures that are easily interpreted in a clinical context. Specifically, measures of absolute risk or the probability of disease are preferred to measures such as relative risk. The difference in absolute risk between interventions is dependent on the numbers of events in both groups, such that the difference (absolute risk reduction) is smaller when there are fewer events. In contrast, the difference in relative risk is fairly constant across groups with different baseline risk for the event, such that the difference (relative risk reduction) is similar across these groups. Relative risk reduction is often more impressive than the absolute risk reduction. Another measure useful in applying the results of a study is the number needed to treat (or harm). The number needed to treat represents the number of patients who would have to be treated with an intervention for 1 additional patient to benefit (experience a positive outcome or avoid a negative outcome). The absolute risk reduction is used to calculate the number needed to treat. An evidence report also emphasizes the quality of the evidence, giving more weight to studies that meet high methodological standards that reduce the likelihood of biased results. In general, for questions about the relative benefits of a drug, the results of well-done, randomized controlled trials are regarded as better evidence than results of cohort, case-control, or cross- sectional studies. These studies, in turn, are considered better evidence than uncontrolled trials or case series. For questions about tolerability and harms, controlled trials typically provide limited information.
Q-statistic: A measure of statistical heterogeneity of the estimates of effect from studies order medrol 4 mg with amex. It is calculated as the weighted sum of the squared difference of each estimate from the mean estimate discount medrol 16mg visa. Random-effects model: A statistical model in which both within-study sampling error (variance) and between-studies variation are included in the assessment of the uncertainty (confidence interval) of the results of a meta-analysis purchase medrol 16mg online. When there is heterogeneity among the results of the included studies beyond chance buy medrol 4mg lowest price, random-effects models will give wider confidence intervals than fixed-effect models. Randomization: The process by which study participants are allocated to treatment groups in a trial. Adequate (that is, unbiased) methods of randomization include computer generated schedules and random-numbers tables. Randomized controlled trial: A trial in which two or more interventions are compared through random allocation of participants. Regression analysis: A statistical modeling technique used to estimate or predict the influence of one or more independent variables on a dependent variable, for example, the effect of age, sex, or confounding disease on the effectiveness of an intervention. Relative risk: The ratio of risks in two groups; same as a risk ratio. Retrospective study: A study in which the outcomes have occurred prior to study entry. Risk: A way of expressing the chance that something will happen. It is a measure of the association between exposure to something and what happens (the outcome). Risk is the same as probability, but it usually is used to describe the probability of an adverse event. It is the rate of events (such as breast cancer) in the total population of people who could have the event (such as women of a certain age). Risk difference: The difference in size of risk between two groups. In intervention studies, it is the ratio of the risk in the intervention group to the risk in the control group. A risk ratio of 1 indicates no difference between comparison groups. For undesirable outcomes, a risk ratio that is <1 indicates that the intervention was effective in reducing the risk of that outcome. Beta blockers Page 81 of 122 Final Report Update 4 Drug Effectiveness Review Project Run-in period: Run in period: A period before randomization when participants are monitored but receive no treatment (or they sometimes all receive one of the study treatments, possibly in a blind fashion). The data from this stage of a trial are only occasionally of value but can serve a valuable role in screening out ineligible or non-compliant participants, in ensuring that participants are in a stable condition, and in providing baseline observations. A run-in period is sometimes called a washout period if treatments that participants were using before entering the trial are discontinued. This term (or the term ‘‘safe’’) should not be used when evidence on harms is simply absent or is insufficient. Sample size: The number of people included in a study. In research reports, sample size is usually expressed as "n. Larger sample sizes also increase the chance that rare events (such as adverse effects of drugs) will be detected. Sensitivity analysis: An analysis used to determine how sensitive the results of a study or systematic review are to changes in how it was done. Sensitivity analyses are used to assess how robust the results are to uncertain decisions or assumptions about the data and the methods that were used.
8 of 10 - Review by A. Bradley
Votes: 184 votes
Total customer reviews: 184